Gihwala and others v grancy property ltd
http://www.scielo.org.za/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1727-37812016000100051 http://www.saflii.org/za/cases/ZAWCHC/2014/97.html
Gihwala and others v grancy property ltd
Did you know?
Web[204] The conduct of Gihwala and Manala with regard to the initial investment made in terms of the February 2005 agreement, was commented on by the Supreme Court of … WebNov 9, 2024 · Delinquent Directors under the Companies Act 71 of 2008: Gihwala v Grancy Property Limited 2016 ZASCA 35 Full-text available Article May 2024 Rehana Cassim View Show abstract The Suspension...
WebIn Gihwala and others v Grancy Property Limited and Others[3], Wallace JA (Louis JA, Leach JA, Seriti JA and Tsoka AJA concurring) ... [11] and Northern Counties Securities Ltd v Jackson and Steeple Ltd[12]. In the latter case, Walton J spelled out that shareholder-directors may act differently in their respective capacities on the same matter. http://erepository.uonbi.ac.ke/bitstream/handle/11295/108785/Mutonyi%20_Tackling%20the%20problem%20of%20corporate%20fraud%20in%20the%20kenyan%20corporations%20through%20the%20lens%20of%20corporate%20governance.pdf?sequence=1
WebGihwala v Grancy Property Ltd, 4 Wallis JA explained that section 162 has a protective purpose: “Its aim is to ensure that those who invest in companies, big or small, are protected against directors who engage in serious misconduct of the type described in these sections. That is conduct that breaches WebGihwala and Others v Grancy Property Ltd and Others (20760/14) [2016] ZASCA 35; [2016] 2 All SA 649 (SCA); 2024 (2) SA 337 (SCA) (24 March 2016) Download original …
http://www.scielo.org.za/scielo.php?script=sci_abstract&pid=S1727-37812016000100051
WebAug 27, 2024 · In Gihwala and Others v Grancy Property Ltd And Others, the directors tried to confront the constitutionality of Section 162(5)(c) on the grounds that it infringed Section 22 of the Constitution because it limited their constitutional right to clearly choose their trade, occupation or profession. game changers age ratingWebIn Gihwala v Grancy Property Limited 7 (hereafter Gihwala) one of the issues before the Supreme Court of Appeal (hereafter SCA) was whether or not to confirm a declaration of delinquency made by the Western Cape Division of the High Court in Grancy Property Limited v Gihwala, 8 (hereafter Grancy) against Mr Gihwala (First Appellant) and Mr … blackdown high schoolWebCase name: GRANCY PROPERTY V MANALA& OTHERS2015 (3) SA313 (SCA)• Facts: Grancy brought application for the appointment of independent directors to be appointed to SMI of which it was a minority shareholder - arising from allegations of malfeasance and moral turpitude against Manala and Gihwala, directors of SMI.• blackdown hillWebApr 3, 2024 · The constitutional challenge was brought on appeal by Mr Gihwala and Mr Manala (who were the directors of Grancy Property Limited (“the company”)) following … game changers aspreyWebNov 29, 2016 · In the most recent case of Gihwala and Others v Grancy Property Ltd and Others (20760/14) [2016] ZASCA 35, the court confirmed that an order of delinquency … gamechangers awardsWebNov 9, 2024 · 15Grancy v Gihwala, above at note 1, para 155. 16 16Msimang v Katuliiba, above at note 2, para 29; Gihwala and Others v Grancy Property Limited and Others2024 (2) SA 337 (SCA), para 14; Lewis v Woollam, above at note 1, para 40. 17 17Rich v Australian Securities and Investments Commission[2004] 220 CLR 129, para 49. 18 … gamechangers athleticsWeb7 Gihwala v Grancy Property Limited 2016 ZASCA 35 (Gihwala). 8 Grancy Property Limited v Gihwala 2014 JDR 1292 (WcC) (Grancy). 9 Section 226 of the Companies Act … blackdown healthy living centre